Evaluation of consumer self-selection of a proposed over-the-counter, progestin-only daily oral contraceptive.

OBJECTIVES: In an effort to switch a norgestrel 0.075 mg progestin-only pill (Opill) from prescription to over-the-counter, we conducted this study to assess whether consumers can use the drug facts label alone to guide appropriate self-selection. STUDY DESIGN: Two studies assessed self-selection: (1) an all-comers, actual-use study evaluating self-selection before purchasing and using norgestrel 0.075 mg and (2) the Targeted Breast Cancer Self-Selection Study evaluating theoretical self-selection among participants with a history of breast cancer. RESULTS: In the actual-use study, based on the label, 1670/1772 participants (94%) were appropriate for use of norgestrel 0.075 mg; 102 (6%) were not appropriate. Of the 102, 66 (65%) correctly did not select and 36 (35%) responded it was okay for them to use norgestrel 0.075 mg. Of the 36 participants who incorrectly self-selected, one had a history of breast cancer and thus might have been adversely affected had they taken norgestrel 0.075 mg. In the Targeted Breast Cancer Self-Selection Study (N = 206), 97% of participants correctly stated norgestrel 0.075 mg was not appropriate for them. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed over-the-counter label enables 98% of potential users to self-select norgestrel 0.075 mg appropriately. Only 2% of potential purchasers may have bought and started to use norgestrel 0.075 mg inappropriately. For two-thirds of these, the potential benefits of their use of the method outweighed any theoretical risks. Adverse clinical consequences of norgestrel 0.075 mg use are unlikely even in those rare cases when the drug facts label was not followed. IMPLICATIONS: The balance of the risk of inappropriate selection to the benefit of taking an over-the-counter progestin-only pill appears to be very much in favor of an overall benefit in terms of unintended pregnancy prevention.

Evaluation of adherence to a daily progestin-only pill in a simulated over-the-counter setting.

OBJECTIVE: The Adherence with Continuous Dose Oral Contraceptive: Evaluation of Self-Selection and Use (ACCESS) study assessed whether consumers can adhere to the regimen for a progestin-only pill (norgestrel 0.075 mg) in an over-the-counter (OTC) setting. STUDY DESIGN: An actual use study in a simulated OTC environment assessed adherence to directions to take norgestrel 0.075 mg every day at the same time in 883 participants for up to 24 weeks. RESULTS: Eighty-five percent (747/883) of participants reported ≥85% adherence to taking norgestrel 0.075 mg every day and reported taking their dose within three hours of their scheduled dosing time on 96% of days. When accounting for use of a condom for 48 hours if a pill was missed, participants reported correctly following the label's directed use for 97% of doses overall, with 95% of participants following label directions for ≥85% of doses. The main limitations were related to finding a balance between intensely collecting data to ensure accurate assessment of adherence and leaving users to behave as they would in a real OTC situation without healthcare practitioner intervention. We observed that some participants reported taking more doses than they could have based on the supply of medication given to them. To fully examine the situation, and the impact on the conclusions, additional post hoc sensitivity analyses were performed, and showed remarkably consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Consumers were highly adherent to taking norgestrel 0.075 mg when using only the information provided by the proposed OTC label. IMPLICATIONS: Adherence to a daily oral contraceptive pill was high when obtained OTC. This suggests that effectiveness of an OTC pill is likely to be like that of a prescribed pill and easier access to this effective contraceptive should allow more opportunity to prevent pregnancy.

Modeling the potential benefit of an over-the-counter progestin-only pill in preventing unintended pregnancies in the U.S.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a model to estimate the possible impact of use of an over-the-counter (OTC) progestin-only pill (POP) on the number of unintended pregnancies in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Using typical use failure rates (7% for POPs), we compared the expected number of unintended pregnancies for two theoretical cohorts of 100,000 women: one which purchased and used an OTC POP exclusively for contraception, the other using contraceptive methods at proportions obtained from an actual-use clinical trial simulating OTC use of norgestrel 0.075 mg (including 35% using no method and only 19% using hormonal contraception or long-acting contraceptives). Sensitivity analyses were conducted using alternative model inputs such as different failure rates for OTC POPs and varied alternative contraceptive method mix. RESULTS: An estimated 37,624 unintended pregnancies would occur annually if 100,000 women continued their usual contraceptive method as used at baseline in the actual use trial. This would be reduced by 81% to 7,000 pregnancies with the exclusive use of an OTC POP - a net reduction of 30,624 unintended pregnancies annually. While the number of unintended pregnancies prevented varied as the model parameters were modified (ranging from 1,461 to 34,124), a net benefit of OTC POP use was observed over a wide range of input values. CONCLUSIONS: Using data from a real-world contraception user profile, our model suggests that use of an OTC POP could reduce the overall number of unintended pregnancies in the United States. This conclusion remains true across a wide range of modeled scenarios. IMPLICATIONS: The estimates suggested by this model are supportive of an OTC switch for a POP.

Adherence among a cohort taking progestin-only pills prescribed by a healthcare provider: Results of the BENCHMARK study.

OBJECTIVES: To measure adherence over six months of progestin-only pill (POP) use. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study measuring adherence to daily dosing and timing of dose in patients prescribed a POP, with up to six months of follow-up, conducted from January to October 2020. A pharmacy benefit manager identified potential participants with a newly prescribed POP and extended an invitation to participate. We enrolled qualified respondents by telephone, trained them to use an electronic diary to report daily whether they had taken their POP and at what time. We followed participants for up to six months. We calculated adherence to daily pill taking as the proportion of evaluable days in which a participant took a POP, and the proportion of participants reporting ≥85% adherence. We calculated adherence to same time each day as the proportion of doses taken no later than three hours after the previous dose time of day. RESULTS: The user population comprised 199 participants, 154 (77.4%) of whom completed six months of follow-up. The majority (n = 170, 85.4%) were taking norethindrone. Norethindrone users reported POP intake on 22,327 (96.4%) of 23,156 evaluable days, with 155 (91.2%) participants reporting ≥85% adherence; less than half (n = 73, 42.9%) reported 100% adherence. Participants reported adherence to same time each day on 21,698 of 22,157 (97.9%) evaluable days. CONCLUSIONS: Among participants taking a prescribed POP, participants demonstrated high adherence for daily pill taking and the same time of day, though the majority were not 100% adherent. IMPLICATIONS: This study reports data specific to adherence among those taking a progestin-only pill (POP) in the prescription setting. Clinicians who counsel patients about POP use should be aware that majority of patients were not 100% adherent, although most report ≥85% adherence.

A review of the effectiveness of a progestogen-only pill containing norgestrel 75 µg/day.

OBJECTIVES: To review published data on the effectiveness of a progestogen-only pill containing norgestrel 75 µg/day which should be under consideration by the FDA in 2022 for sale over the counter in the US. STUDY DESIGN: A literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE REVIEWS using specified search terms and adding related cross-references. RESULTS: We identified a total of thirteen relevant studies of women using norgestrel 75 µg/day. None were reported with the rigor characteristic of trial reporting today. Nevertheless, six studies provided data on 3,184 women who were not breastfeeding, followed for over 35,000 months and reported a range of overall failure rates during typical use of norgestrel 75 µg/day from 0 to 2.4/hundred woman-years giving an aggregate Pearl Index of 2.2. Seven additional studies involved 5,445 women some of whom were breastfeeding for at least part of the period of follow-up. More than 36,000 months of use yielded 12-month life table cumulative pregnancy rates for norgestrel 75 µg/day ranging from 0 to 3.4. We were unable to calculate an aggregate Pearl Index for the breastfeeding studies because of lack of crucial data. CONCLUSIONS: The data support that norgestrel 75 µg/day is highly effective in clinical use, with similar estimates of failure in breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding women, providing support to the case for approval without the need to see a healthcare provider.

Postpartum contraceptive counseling for first-time adolescent mothers: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Rapid repeat pregnancy is common among adolescent mothers and is associated with increased risks of adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes. Increasing contraceptive uptake among postpartum adolescents may decrease these outcomes through pregnancy prevention. This randomized controlled trial of 100 postpartum adolescent women assessed the effect of a standardized immediate postpartum contraceptive counseling intervention emphasizing healthy birth spacing and the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC). METHODS: After a baseline survey about reproductive health and pregnancy intentions, all subjects received routine postpartum contraceptive counseling. The intervention group also received the standardized counseling intervention. All participants had access to immediate postpartum contraceptive implant initiation or to intrauterine device (IUD) insertion at postpartum follow-up. Contraceptive use and repeat pregnancy were assessed quarterly for 12 months. Differences in repeat pregnancy, as well as contraceptive initiation, continuation, and satisfaction were analyzed. RESULTS: There was no difference in repeat pregnancy or contraceptive initiation, continuation or satisfaction between the study groups. However, regardless of group assignment, all subjects who desired the contraceptive implant used the method, compared to 15% of subjects who desired the IUD (p < 0.001). Three pregnancies occurred among subjects who desired the IUD versus none amongst subjects who desired the implant (p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: This standardized postpartum contraceptive counseling intervention did not affect teens' repeat pregnancies or contraceptive use. However, immediate postpartum availability of the contraceptive implant was associated with increased utilization of this method when compared to the IUD. Future postpartum contraceptive efforts should investigate procedures to improve teens' access to postpartum contraception. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01814930.

Postpartum adolescents' contraceptive counselling preferences.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal approach for provision and timing of postpartum contraceptive counselling for adolescents has not been established. To reduce repeat pregnancies from current USA levels of nearly 20%, a better understanding is needed of postpartum adolescent females' preferences regarding contraceptive counselling and delivery. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 30 USA postpartum teens (97% Black) explored pregnancy prevention and contraceptive counselling. Transcripts were independently coded by two researchers and inter-rater reliability calculated using Kappa coefficients. With a standard content analysis approach, common themes were identified, coded and summarized. RESULTS: Findings indicated pregnancy prevention was important - two thirds of subjects reported becoming pregnant 'too soon', almost all did not desire another child for at least 6 years and most indicated that pregnancy prevention was either 'very' or 'extremely' important right now. The subjects described doctors and their prenatal clinic as their most accurate sources of contraception information, but stated that doctors and parents were the most helpful sources. All were comfortable discussing contraception with providers and had a desire for shared decision making. While many had received written materials, most preferred in-person contraceptive counselling. Optimally, participants suggested that contraceptive counselling would be provided by a physician, begin antepartum and almost all preferred to leave the hospital with their chosen method of contraception. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy prevention is important for postpartum adolescents as most desired to delay future childbearing. In-person contraceptive counselling should begin in the antepartum period and include provision of contraception prior to discharge.

Postpartum contraception.

As birth spacing has demonstrated health benefits for a woman and her children, contraception after childbirth is recognized as an important health issue. The potential risk of pregnancy soon after delivery underscores the importance of initiating postpartum contraception in a timely manner. The contraceptive method initiated in the postpartum period depends upon a number of factors including medical history, anatomic and hormonal factors, patient preference, and whether or not the woman is breastfeeding. When electing a contraceptive method, informed choice is paramount. The availability of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods immediately postpartum provides a strategy to achieve reductions in unintended pregnancy.

Ovulation resumption after medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol.

BACKGROUND: As an antiprogestin, mifepristone may have an impact on the return to ovulation in a manner that is not only attributable to its abortifacient activity. Our aim was to measure the time-to-ovulation in women who received mifepristone 200 mg orally and misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally for abortion up to 63 days of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: This planned substudy was part of a multicenter randomized trial of mifepristone 200 mg followed immediately or 24 h later by misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally. Women who had successful expulsion of the gestational sac based on ultrasound examination 1 week after mifepristone treatment were enrolled. All subjects used nonhormonal contraception until study completion. Baseline serum progesterone (P) levels were drawn on day 8±1 after mifepristone administration and then twice weekly until the P level was >3 ng/mL, consistent with ovulation. The mean time-to-ovulation was calculated using interval censored regression to address the censoring due to participant discontinuation. RESULTS: Fourteen (52%) of 27 enrolled women completed the substudy. The longest period of time that a subject who did not complete the study was followed was 29 days. Ovulation occurred 20.6±5.1 (range 8-36) days after mifepristone administration. Time-to-ovulation was not affected by participant age, gestational age, study arm, body mass index or presence or absence of human chorionic gonadotropin. CONCLUSIONS: Return to ovulation following medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol occurs on average 3 weeks postabortion. Mifepristone 200 mg does not appear to have a lasting effect on ovarian function. Our results should be contextualized by the small sample size, although this is one of the larger studies on return to ovulation after abortion.